Blog

Nasa astronauts Sunita Williams and Butch Wilmore, who have been residing on the International Space Station (ISS) since June 2024, have addressed worries regarding the notion of being “stranded.” Their mission, initially slated for ten days, has encountered an extension due to issues with Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. While investigations are ongoing, Williams and Wilmore are scheduled to return to Earth via SpaceX’s Crew-9 mission, planned for departure in March 2025. In light of various speculations, both astronauts have asserted that they do not feel abandoned or trapped in space.

Mission Extension and Technical Issues

As detailed by Space.com, NASA reported that the Starliner spacecraft faced thruster problems during docking, necessitating a thorough examination. In light of these complications, it was determined that Williams and Wilmore would return on Crew-9’s Dragon capsule. This change aligns their return with the standard six-month rotation schedule for the ISS crew. The delay has stemmed from ongoing developments on a new Crew Dragon vehicle, which has recently been exchanged for a different one to speed up the mission timeline.

Addressing the ‘Stranded’ Narrative

According to space.com, in an interview with CNN, Wilmore emphasized that the current circumstances represent a planned modification rather than an urgent situation. He stated that they neither feel deserted nor do they sense being stuck or stranded. He elaborated that in case of an emergency, all astronauts aboard the ISS have immediate return options available. Williams echoed his sentiments, sharing that their prolonged stay has allowed them to adjust and continue their mission-related tasks.

Return Schedule and Future Plans

NASA has slated the launch of Crew-10 for March 12, with Crew-9 anticipated to return about a week later. Once this transition occurs, Williams and Wilmore will wrap up their extended mission. As they prepare for their return, both astronauts have communicated their dedication to fulfilling their mission goals while on the ISS.

The Galaxy S24+, Samsung’s Plus edition, often finds itself overlooked as the middle option in the Galaxy S series lineup. To many, it appears to be just a larger Galaxy S24, featuring an expanded display and enhanced battery. Most consumers tend to opt for the more premium Galaxy S24 Ultra. Yet, the Galaxy S24+ is more than just that; while it shares many specifications with the standard S24, my week-long experience with the S24+ has convinced me that sometimes, bigger is indeed better.

Is it worth choosing the Galaxy S24+ over the Galaxy S24, or perhaps even the Galaxy S24 Ultra? Read on to discover more.

Pricing of Samsung Galaxy S24+ in India

Be prepared for a steep price with the Galaxy S24+, which comes in two variants in India: the 12GB + 256GB model priced at Rs. 99,999, and the 12GB + 512GB option available for Rs. 1,09,999.

Galaxy S24+ supports rapid 45W charging, but a charger is not included.

In terms of color choices, you can find the Galaxy S24+ in Cobalt Violet and Onyx Black, with additional exclusive options like Sapphire Blue and Jade Green available for online purchase. We received the Cobalt Violet variant, equipped with 12GB RAM and 512GB of storage.

The box contains the phone, basic documentation, a SIM ejector tool, and a USB Type-C to Type-C cable.

Design Review of Samsung Galaxy S24+ 5G

Regarding design, the Galaxy S24+ can be seen as a larger version of the Galaxy S24 or a continuation of the Galaxy S23/Galaxy S22 aesthetics. While the overall design remains consistent from previous years, the materials used are of a noticeably higher quality. In comparison to the Galaxy S23+, the updated Galaxy S24+ features a more robust Armor 2 aluminum frame. Despite being larger than the standard Galaxy S24, it remains manageable for one-handed use for people with bigger hands. Weighing in at 197 grams and retaining a thickness of 7.7mm, it exudes a premium feel and is built to withstand daily use (though I did refrain from testing this aspect).

The Galaxy S24+ showcases an Armor 2 aluminum construction.

It boasts uniform and slim bezels on the front, which are more streamlined than those found on previous models. There’s a small opening at the top for the earpiece speaker and an in-screen ultrasonic fingerprint scanner. The Galaxy S24+ is protected by the same Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and has an IP68 rating as its smaller counterpart. On the back, you’ll find the familiar triple-camera setup, with each lens encased in its own metal ring. The LED flash is situated alongside the three vertically aligned sensors but is placed a bit lower than that of the Galaxy S23+.

Specifications and Software Review of Samsung Galaxy S24+

When it comes to specifications, the only variance between the Galaxy S24+ and the standard Galaxy S24 is the increased battery size. The phone is powered by the 4nm Exynos 2400 SoC and is complemented by the Xclipse 940 GPU, offering up to 12GB RAM (an upgrade from the 8GB on the Galaxy S23+) and up to 512GB UFS 4.0 storage. It’s important to note that there’s no option for expandable storage. For connectivity, the device supports tri-band Wi-Fi 6E, NFC, Bluetooth 5.3 LE, as well as a USB Type-C 3.2 port, alongside typical GPS satellite support.

Samsung’s ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is highly dependable, and I believe more smartphone manufacturers ought to utilize this technology in place of optical sensors due to its quicker speed and accuracy. I have never encountered issues with it.

Samsung has committed to providing seven years of software updates for the Galaxy S24+.

The device is equipped with a 4,900mAh battery, which is considerably larger than the 4,000mAh battery of the Galaxy S24 and slightly bigger than the 4,700mAh battery found in the Galaxy S23+. Nonetheless, it only supports 45W fast charging and 15W wireless charging, which remains unchanged from last year’s offerings.

However, there’s a significant change this year regarding software support. Samsung is now offering seven years of Android OS and security updates. The Galaxy S24+ comes pre-installed with Android 14 and One UI 6.1. Additionally, it includes the latest Galaxy AI features, the details of which can be found in our comprehensive Galaxy S24 review.

Performance Review of Samsung Galaxy S24+

Diving into performance, the Exynos 2400 SoC within the Galaxy S24+ delivers flagship-level efficiency across all tasks. Although the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SoC may perform better in benchmark comparisons, you’ll likely not perceive any differences during regular use or gaming. During my performance evaluations of the Galaxy S24+, I found its benchmark scores to be comparable to those of the Galaxy S24. The device achieved an AnTuTu score of 1,457,608 and recorded a single-core Geekbench score of 1987 and multi-core score of 6137. While the AnTuTu score was marginally lower than that of the Galaxy S24, its Geekbench score was superior, potentially due to the increased cooling surface area of the Plus model. Similar outcomes were noted in GFXbench tests.

The Galaxy S24+ display achieves a peak brightness level of 2,600nits.

Now addressing the display—this is where the improvements are notably palpable. The Galaxy S24+ sports a slightly larger 6.7-inch display compared to the 6.6-inch one on last year’s Galaxy S23+. Additionally, it embraces slimmer bezels and features a brighter LTPO AMOLED 2x panel with a peak brightness of 2,600 nits and QHD+ resolution. It maintains a fluid 120Hz refresh rate. The display is intensely bright and easily readable in outdoor conditions.

In terms of audio, the smartphone employs a dual speaker configuration, delivering ample sound with satisfying bass. Call clarity is also exceptional.

When it comes to gaming, the experience on the Galaxy S24+ is quite similar to that of the standard S24—games run smoothly at maximum settings with no noticeable lag. You might, however, observe some heat generation during prolonged gaming sessions. I found that the device heats up relatively quickly when running benchmark tests as well.

Heat buildup occurs during charging and gaming sessions.

Regarding battery efficiency, the phone lasted 19 hours and 17 minutes in our HD loop test with QHD+ resolution settings. While the higher resolution can impact battery longevity, you may extend usage periods by lowering the resolution. With standard usage patterns, the device easily lasts over a day, though heavy users may need to recharge by day’s end. Charging takes approximately 1 hour and 15 minutes when using a 45W+ charger with a high-rated cable. The device comes with a 3A-rated cable supporting up to 25W fast charging. For charging tests, I utilized a 125W charger.

Camera Review of Samsung Galaxy S24+

In 2022, Google surprised many when it decided to bring its Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro smartphones to India.  Between the two, the Pixel 7 was launched at Rs. 59,999, but can now be found at around Rs. 55,999 online, making it more accessible than any of its predecessors. Google recently launched the Pixel 7a in India, its ‘pocket-friendly’ version of the Pixel 7. This new phone has received several upgrades over its predecessor, the Pixel 6a, and surprisingly comes in at the same price of Rs. 43,999 for the sole variant with 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. 

Without a massive price difference between it and the Pixel 7, should you pay an additional Rs. 12,000 for the more premium model, and is the Pixel 7a worth upgrading to from a Pixel 6a? Let’s find out.

Google Pixel 7a design

The Google Pixel 7a may appear premium at first glance, but it’s just as much of a smudge and dust magnet as the Pixel 6a was. These smudges are quite hard to notice on the Snow finish, but the Sea and Charcoal finishes probably won’t be so forgiving. Since the rear panel is made of plastic just like the Pixel 6a, it tends to get scratched easily. While its design mimics the premium look of the Pixel 7, it’s definitely not the same when it comes to quality of materials used.

I found the edges of the rear panels to be slightly misaligned on my unit as they didn’t have a seamless fit where they met the metal frame. The same also applies to the metal rear camera band, which could have benefitted from better finishing as it is noticeably sharper in comparison to the better made camera module on the Pixel 7. The previous Pixel 6a did not have any such imperfections, so it’s disappointing to see this on the new model. However, you can simply slap on a case and forget all about it.

The Google Pixel 7a’s rear panel is made out of plastic

The Google Pixel 7a also feels a bit heavy at 193g but is still quite compact and good for one-handed use. The Pixel 6a is a lot lighter at 178g but the additional weight of the new model is probably down to the addition of wireless charging. This could also be the reason why Google went with a smaller battery for the 7a, but more on that in a bit.

What I like about the Pixel 7a’s design is that just like its predecessor, it is still one of the very few smartphones in this segment to offer an IP67 rating for dust and water resistance, with Samsung’s now dated Galaxy S20 FE 5G being the other.

Google Pixel 7a specifications and software

The Pixel 7a offers the latest and greatest from Google when it comes to processing power. The Tensor G2 SoC which is also present in the Pixel 7 and 7 Pro models (as well as the recently announced Pixel Fold) now comes to Google’s affordable A series. Apart from being more powerful and power-efficient compared to the older Tensor processor, it also adds some additional camera and photo editing features.

Google still does not offer any RAM or storage variants and the 128GB of UFS 3.1 storage might not be enough for everyone, as the Pixel 7a does not support expandable storage. There is no free cloud storage option (anymore) either, apart from a few offers which expire in a couple of months. However, it’s nice to finally see 8GB of RAM being made available on a Pixel A series device for the first time ever.

The Pixel 7a (right) appears a lot more premium compared to the Pixel 6a (left)

The fingerprint reader is embedded in the 6.1-inch full-HD+ OLED display, which has a 90Hz maximum screen refresh rate. Thankfully, it’s not as troublesome as the Pixel 6a’s fingerprint reader when it was launched and worked reliably out of the box. Communications standards include Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, NFC and support for a multitude of 5G bands. There’s a single nano-SIM slot but users can add a second phone number to their device by using the eSIM feature.

The Google Pixel 7a is powered by a 4,385mAh battery, which is smaller than last year’s model. Charging speeds have been capped at 18W for wired charging and 7.5W for wireless charging. As always, Google does not provide a charger in the box.

The software experience on the Google Pixel 7a is typically Google with Android 13 and the slightly customised Pixel software experience. There are no additional apps or bloatware as one would expect from a Pixel device. There’s nothing new here compared to what I experienced on the Pixel 6a or even the Pixel 7 models which we reviewed last year. Google promises three years of software updates and five years of security updates. There’s also the usual feature drops, which should instil confidence in buyers who are new to the Pixel brand.

The overall design of the Google Pixel 7a appears very much like the premium Pixel 7

Google Pixel 7a performance

In terms of performance, Android 13 ran smoothly without any hiccups. The 8GB of RAM in the Google Pixel 7a also helped when it came to multitasking, keeping apps in memory for a while. The 90Hz refresh rate also helped with the software experience by a large margin, making the entire interface appear quite fluid compared to the 60Hz panel on the Pixel 6a.

Colours, when viewed in the ‘Natural display’ colour mode, are quite accurate and the display was bright enough when used outdoors during the day. It is also HDR10-certified and most apps like Netflix, Youtube and Prime Video supported the same, with content appearing as expected.

As for raw performance, the Google Pixel 7a scores better than the Pixel 6a in most benchmarks and produces numbers that are on par with the premium Pixel 7. The 7a managed 7,16,837 points in AnTuTu, and 1,396 and 3,116 points in Geekbench’s single and multi-core tests respectively. In terms of graphics, the Pixel 7a managed 90fps, 85fps and 60fps in GFXBench’s T-Rex, Manhattan 3.1 and Car Chase test suites, respectively.

The Google Pixel 7a packs an impressive 90Hz refresh rate OLED display

Gaming performance was quite good overall. I tried out Call of Duty: Mobile and could comfortably play it at its default settings (Very High graphics and framerate) without any lag or stuttering, which was not possible on the Pixel 6a. Touch sampling rate was adequate for playing such mobile titles and I was able to make full use of the 90Hz refresh rate by switching to Ultra framerate in the game’s settings.

The phone does get warm when playing Call of Duty at Ultra settings. However, I did not notice any performance drops even when gaming for up to 30 minutes at a stretch. 

Despite the processor upgrade, the Google Pixel 7a has to keep up with the demands of a 90Hz display and do so with a smaller battery than last year’s model. Our standard video loop battery test on the 7a fared worse than the Pixel 6a, managing just 12 hours, 39 minutes on a single charge, which is average for a small phone, but below average for its segment.

With my typical daily use, which included scrolling through social media apps, video streaming, some camera usage and about an hour of gaming, the Pixel 7a barely made it through a full day with about 10 percent charge left in the tank. All-in-all, this definitely isn’t a phone for power users.

The Google Pixel 7a is the first A-series Pixel to come with wireless charging

Since there’s no charger in the box, I plugged the Google Pixel 7a into a 61W USB PD charger. Despite the claimed 18W charging speed by Google, the phone took a good two hours and seven minutes to fully charge, which is very slow. The 7a does come with wireless charging, which is another first for a Pixel A-series device. This is good for keeping it topped up at all times when not in use, provided you have several wireless charging pads in your home or office. Indeed, I would have preferred a bigger battery or faster charging, instead of wireless charging and smaller battery.

Google Pixel 7a cameras

The cameras on the Google Pixel 7a are another area to have received noticeable upgrades. The primary camera has been upgraded to a 64-megapixel sensor with OIS. The ultra-wide camera has also been bumped up from a 12-megapixel sensor to a 13-megapixel sensor. And the same goes for the selfie camera, which has been bumped up from an 8-megapixel camera to a 13-megapixel camera. Despite the varying sensor resolutions, all three cameras capture 12-megapixel binned images by default, but the setup still lacks macro photography capability.

The Tensor G2 SoC also brings some handy camera tricks as we have seen with the Pixel 7 and 7 Pro models. There’s no Action Pan mode like on the premium Pixel 7, but you do get a Long Exposure mode which manages some quality long exposure photos without the use of a tripod. The new Night mode is almost twice as fast as the Pixel 6a’s Night Sight mode and this also applies to the post capture processing. Also available, is the Photo Unblur feature which basically removes the minor blurring from images that have it. I found this especially useful when trying to run and capture photos of my kid.

The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 SoC enables features such as Long Exposure mode

What I did notice while capturing photos and videos outdoors is how quickly the Pixel 7a heats up. This increases quickly when using the more processor intensive camera modes like Portrait mode or Long Exposure. On several such occasions, when switching to video mode to record 4K videos, I did get a pop-up notification stating that the device is too hot and that video quality may be reduced, but the camera app did not close. I also had background photo back-ups disabled when reviewing it, so clearly that did not contribute to the heating.

Thankfully, the Google Pixel 7a’s imaging chops are quite capable. To give you an idea about the 7a’s camera improvements, I have included some comparison samples with last year’s Pixel 6a.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 6a daylight camera samples (tap to see full size)

Daylight imaging quality is quite impressive. The new cameras and processor bring improvements in dynamic range and overall details. These are initially hard to spot unless you “pixel” peep, but a majority of photos taken with the Pixel 7a mange to capture those extra textures that are either missing or appear soft in photos taken with a Pixel 6a. The Pixel 7a also ends up delivering more accurate colour tones overall. There’s no macro mode like on the Pixel 7 Pro, but I managed to get some close-ups which appeared almost identical on both devices.

The new ultra-wide camera offers a noticeably wider field of view compared to the older one. There’s noticeable barrel distortion along with purple fringing, but these are still one of the best ultra-wide photos you can get on a smartphone at this price point.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 6a portrait selfie camera samples (tap to see full size)

Selfies from the Google Pixel 7a in daylight came out a bit soft and showed less detail compared to the selfies from the Pixel 6a. The new 13-megapixel selfie camera also has a much tighter frame when shooting selfies, which makes it hard to include more than two subjects in the frame, unless you have very long hands. In low light, the Pixel 6a managed better selfies than the 7a, which was a little surprising.

Google Pixel 7a vs Pixel 6a low-light camera samples (tap to see full size)

Shooting with the rear cameras in low light was a much better experience on the Pixel 7a. The Tensor G2 processor makes it far more capable for capturing sharper images of moving kids or pets (subjects that never stay still). When using the dedicated Night Sight mode, the Pixel 7a manages sharper and more blur-free photos of moving subjects or objects in any given scene. The level of detail is similar with both the 6a and 7a, but colours are better on the latter. In more dimly-lit scenes, the Pixel 7a comes out of top offering slightly better detail and sharpness. The ultra-wide camera captures decent quality images in low light when used with the Night Sight shooting mode, but showcased a lot of crushed blacks in the shadows.

The Pixel 7a’s digital zoom manages superior images in all types of lighting conditions thanks to the larger sensor and Super Res Zoom technology

While Google’s Pixel 7 and Pixel 7 Pro models fared a lot better, the Pixel 7a does not pack certain camera hardware such as the multi-directional PDAF, laser autofocus, and more. It also lacks HDR10 recording capability, which is possible on the Pixel 7. Regardless, 4K 30fps video recording on the Pixel 7a had good details in daylight but showcased purple fringing in the bright spots. 4K 60fps video looked a lot better in comparison with a steady framerate. In low light, the Pixel 7a managed better quality video with a lot less noise than the Pixel 6a, when recording at 4K 30fps and 60fps.

Verdict

From the various upgrades the Google Pixel 7a has received, the selfie camera and reduced battery life seem to be the only main compromises. The Pixel 7a is finally on par with the competition thanks to the Tensor G2 SoC and comes with a clean Android 13 interface which cannot be matched at this price point. In more ways than one, it’s definitely a worthy upgrade even for those using a Pixel 6a (Review).

If you are looking for faster charging, then the OnePlus 11R 5G (Review) is a much better choice with better battery back up and 100W wired charging at your disposal, but it lacks wireless charging and an IP rating. This makes the Pixel 7a a very unique offering as it offers good value and a very unique set of features at Rs. 43,999, which includes very capable cameras.

Its only real competitor is the Pixel 7 (Review) which is currently priced at Rs. 55,999, which offers a bit more polish when it comes to design and build quality, more capable camera hardware, and reliable battery life. For power users, these things would matter and spending that premium over the 7a might be worth it for some.